Quoted by Rothbard at http://www.mises.org/rothbard/newliberty5.asp:

No individual rights should be denied or abridged by the laws of the United States or any state or locality on account of sex, race, color, creed, age, national origin, or sexual preference.


From the July-August 1979 Libertarian Review:

Current LP Planks
Slightly amended by
Bill Evers and Murray N. Rothbard
ENERGY
We recognize the great mischief that a host of government
interferences have caused in the energy industry, and the even
greater mischief - amounting to a total regimentation of the
American economy and society - that is threatened by recent
and proposed interventions.
We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation,
and production, such as that imposed by the Federal Power
Commission, the Department of Energy, state public utility commissions,
and state pro-rationing agencies. Thus, we advocate
decontrol of the prices of oil, petroleum products, and natural
gas. We call for the immediate decontrol of gasoline prices, and
elimination of the federal allocation program for crude oil and
gasoline. We condemn the proposed "windfall profits tax" which
is really a graduated excise tax onthe production of crude oil, and
which would cripple the discovery and production of oil. We
oppose all government subsidies for energy research, development,
and operation. We oppose a subsidized federal Energy
Security Corporation, which would develop expensive and
commercially unviable synthetic fuels. We also oppose its financing
via the issue of small denomination bonds, which would
rapidly lose their value in an era of inflation. We also oppose
government subsidies to a solar development bank for solar
energy.
We favor the privatization of the nuclear energy industry. The
Nuclear Regulatory Commission should be abolished. Since the
nuclear industry, like other industries, has its risks, the Price-
Anderson Act, through which the government limits private liability
for nuclear accidents, and funishes partial payment at
tax~aveerx Dense. should be re~ealedT. he nuclear power industry,-
liie other indktries, should be set free to meet ihe test of the
free market.
We oppose the proposed federal Energy Mobilization Board,
which would wield dictatorial powers in order to override normal
legal processes. We oppose all government conservation
schemes through the use of taxes, subsidies, and regulations, as
well as the dictated conversion of utilities and other industries to
coal. We denounce ail temperature level regulations as despotic
and oppressive. We oppose any attempt to give the federal government
a monopoly over the importation of oil, or to develop a
subsidized government energy corporation whose privileged
status would be used as a yardstick for condemning private enterprise.
We oppose the "strategic storage" program, any attempts
to compel national self-sufficiency in oil, any extension of
the cargo preference law to imports, and any attempt to raise oil
tariffs or impose oil import quotas. We oppose all efforts to
nationalize energy companies or breakup vertically and horizontally
integrated energy companies or force them to divest their
pipelines.
We favor the creation of a free market in oil by instituting a
system of full property rights inunderground oil and by repeal of
all federal and state controls over price and output in the petroleum
industry. All government-owned energy resources
should be turned over to private ownership.
We consider all attempts to impose an operating or standby
program of gasoline rationing as unworkable, unnecessary, and
tyrannical.
PUBLICUTILITIES
We advocate the termination of government-created franchise
privileges and governmental monopolies for such services as
garbage collection, electricity, natural gas, telephone, or water
supplies. Furthermore, all rate regulation in these industries
should be abolished. The right to offer such sewices on the
market should not be curtailed by law.
POLLUTION
We support the development of an objective system defining
individual property rights to air and water. We hold that ambiguities
in the area of these rights (e.g. the concept of "public
property") are a primary cause of our deteriorating environment.
Present legal principles which allow the violation of individual
rights by polluters must be reversed. The laws of nuisance and
tort injury should be modified to cover damage done by air, water,
and noise pollution. While we maintain that no one has the right
to violate the legitimate property rights of others by polluting, we
strenuously oppose all attempts to transform the defense of such
rights into any restriction of the efforts of individuals to advance
technology, to expand production, or to use their property peacefully.
We therefore support the abolition of the Environmental
Protection Agency